Lawmakers reintroduce DOMA repeal bill on heels of Supreme Court ruling
U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.)
WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein(D-Calif.) and U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday reintroduced the Respect for Marriage Act in the U.S. Congress, just hours after theU.S. Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
The Respect for Marriage Act would fully repeal DOMA and establish a clear guidelines for the federal government that all married same-sex couples – regardless of what state they currently live in – have access to equal rights, benefits, and protections under federal law.
Feinstein, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who was one of 14 senators to oppose DOMA in 1996, said Wednesday’s ruling by the Supreme Court “clearly establishes that one class of legally married individuals cannot be denied rights under federal law accorded to all other legally married couples” and that repealing DOMA “is necessary because inequities in the administration of more than 1,100 federal laws affected will still need to be fixed.”
“It is time Congress strike this discriminatory law once and for all,” she said.
Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Subcommittee, noted that the Supreme Court ruled that only Section 3 of DOMA is unconstitutional, but Congress still must repeal the law in its entirety.
“That is why we are reintroducing the Respect for Marriage Act, which repeals DOMA in its entirety and sends DOMA into the history books where it belongs. This bill ensures repeal of section 2 of DOMA, which was not at issue in the Windsor case and purports to excuse the states from even considering whether to honor the marriage of a gay and lesbian couple performed by a sister state,” said Nadler.
Section 3 of DOMA had codified the non-recognition of same-sex marriages for all federal purposes
The Respect for Marriage Act would provide a uniform rule for recognizing couples under federal law, and “will finally expunge DOMA’s discrimination from our nation’s laws and provide certainty to every married same-sex couple that their federal recognition will follow them wherever they may live or travel,” said Nadler.
Washington State Supreme Court sides with same-sex couple who was refused service by Christian florist
Claims of right to discriminate based on her religious beliefs again rejectedFebruary 17, 2017
- Even religious Americans support same-sex marriage, dislike “religious freedom” laws, February 8, 2017
- BREAKING: Vague anti-same-sex marriage bill passes Virginia House committee, January 26, 2017
- BREAKING: Bill to allow a “person” to deny services for same-sex weddings passes Virginia House subcommittee, January 19, 2017
- Prev Supreme Court rejects appeals in gay rights cases from Ariz., Nev.
- Next U.S. House lawmaker vows to introduce constitutional ban on gay marriage
- Back to top
- Congressman Dave Brat signs letter urging Trump to support federal “religious freedom” law
- Northam recruits Virginia’s same-sex marriage plaintiffs in new campaign ad
- ‘Beautiful: The Carol King Musical’ at the Altria offers powerful insight into the pop music legend’s dark romantic past
- Richmond LGBTQ activist found stabbed to death, left for weeks, in Chesterfield home
- National LGBTQ campaign group backs transgender candidate in race against author of Virginia’s same-sex marriage ban