Concerns About SB 701 Addressed: “If this bill passes, you cannot be discriminated against if you are an LGBT state employee.”
Read More:
SB 701 aims to provide state employees in Virginia protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity expression. But Virginia’s history with LGBT rights and the language of the bill has attracted detractors from within the community.
“If you don’t try, you can’t win, so that’s why we’re going forward,” said Senator Don McEachin, one of the authors of the bill. He realizes the chances of this bill getting past both the Senate and the House are slim. But there is a reason for these pushes for equality in the face of such obstacles.
To Equality Virginia, Virginia’s largest LGBT lobbying group, the realistic goal is not so much passing the legislation as getting legislators on record. “This is not our end game bill – it’s a step-by-step process, just like marriage equality. This bill passing is what gets us to the next level protecting all LGBT public employees in Virginia,” said James Parrish, Equality Virginia’s Executive Director.
The fight for these protections is not without pushback – even some from within the LGBT community. The complaints are:
1 – The bill lists ‘gender identity and expression’ under the definition of sexual orientation
2 – The bill only gives protections to state employees
Parrish had started to hear rumblings from groups who opposed these sections, and it is something he sympathizes with. “I can understand the transgender community is not excited about the language of the bill,” said Parrish. “Nobody in this day would consider gender identity and expression as part of the definition of sexual orientation.”
But Parrish said working with legislators to get this bill out of committee and onto the floor for a vote is a challenge on its own, and fine-tuning the language of the bill is what makes the difference. “When the bills were written 3-4 years ago, there were delegates and senators who said “I want to support this bill but I can’t support this with gender identity expression written in there,” said Parrish. The same went for including employees of private businesses in the state – that provision would get the bill killed in committee and stop the bill from even reaching the senate.
“A good thing you want to do is use the same bill when you can… this bill has passed twice in the Senate, and this is the only LGBT positive bill to ever pass the Senate or the House,” said Parrish. So the bill uses the same language every year to help speed it through the Senate, where it then gets a vote in the House.
Once the bill enters the House, where it’s sure to be squashed by the Republican majority, it creates a voting record for people to examine the next time they enter the polls. “It’s a way to show who is out of touch, and all these out-of-touch people are making decisions for us,” said Parrish.
Parrish acknowledges the issues with SB 701 from those within the LGBT community, and he hopes to tweak the bill in the future. But for now, Parrish said, “It might not be the pretty road, but it’s the road that takes you there… everyone gets lost in words and factions, but if this bill passes, you cannot be discriminated against if you are an LGBT state employee.”
EV currently has an online petition to build support for SB 701. You can sign the petition here.
Related Stories
Xbox One Makes Cam2Cam Sessions Easier Than Ever
This week Microsoft revealed the Xbox One, the successor to the Xbox 360. Boasting a sleek new controller, loads of processing power, and an updated Kinect peripheral worthy of SkyNet, the Xbox One is ready to go head to head with Nintendo’s Wii U and Sony’s upcoming Playstation 4 for its share of the next-gen [...]
May 23, 2013- Prev SOTD: My Gold Mask – Violet Eyes
- Next Theater Review: The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe
- Topics
- Back to top
-
-
-
Recent Posts
- Xbox One Makes Cam2Cam Sessions Easier Than Ever
- RVA Animal Control Has Amazingly Cute Dogs For You To Adopt (with Holiday Special!)
- Californians, gay rights advocates worldwide remember Harvey Milk
- ACLU, attorney condemn prosecution of FL teen who had sex with minor girlfriend
- Gay Electro-Pop Artist Makes Waves
Friend Activity
-
-
GayRVA on Twitter













One Comment
So, if I get this, it’s better to re-run a bill that is factually incorrect and that while passing the Senate twice, has ultimately failed in the house. It’s better because it gets legislators on record for their position. What if one of the problems in the house was that the bill is factually incorrect? Why not fix it right away and go forward with something that could be passed at some point without the fear that it might be shot down in one court after it finally passes? Is it possible that it’s already quietly being held up by members of the house because the language in the bill is wrong? …just a thought…Robyn Deane